About Staff

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Staff has created 98 blog entries.

Super Lawyers Names Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman as 2025 Super Lawyers

Andrew Friedman, Greg Helmer named Super Lawyer Top 100 2025.February 20, 2025 – Los Angeles – Helmer Friedman LLP is very pleased to announce that the lawyer rating service Super Lawyers has named founding partners Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman as 2025 Super Lawyers. Using its patented multiphase selection process (U.S. Pat. No. 8,412,564), Super Lawyers annually creates a comprehensive and diverse listing of the top 5% of attorneys in various practice areas, such as employment law. “It is a tremendous honor to have been once again named by Super Lawyers to its list of the top 5% of all of the labor and employment law attorneys in Southern California,” Gregory D. Helmer commented, “Super Lawyers has been recognizing us since 2006 and we couldn’t be prouder of this accomplishment.” “We are also very proud that two of our amazing co-counsel – Charles T. Mathews and Courtney Abrams – have also been recognized as 2025 Super Lawyers,” Andrew H. Friedman added.

2025-10-23T10:55:19-08:00February 25th, 2025|employment law, Front Page News|Comments Off on Super Lawyers Names Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman as 2025 Super Lawyers

Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California Publishes Article By Andrew H. Friedman

Andrew Friedman and Erin Kelly article published February 2025 Advocate Magazine.

February 1, 2025 – Helmer Friedman LLP congratulates partner Andrew H. Friedman and former Helmer Friedman LLP attorney Erin Kelly on the publication of their article – “The best and worst employment cases of 2024 – A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE CASES THAT SHAPED THE YEAR IN EMPLOYMENT LAW (WITH A BIT OF COLOR COMMENTARY) – in the Advocate Journal (a publication of the Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California – February 2025).  Click here to read the article.

2025-02-11T11:08:52-08:00February 1st, 2025|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications, Erin Kelly|Comments Off on Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California Publishes Article By Andrew H. Friedman

California Lawyers Association Publishes Law Review Article Co-Authored by Andrew H. Friedman

Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi, Anthony J. Oncidi Author Article For the California Labor & Employment Law Review

January 1, 2025 – Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi (an employment law mediator with The Mizrahi Law Firm), and Anthony “Tony” J. Oncidi (a partner in and Co-Chair of the Labor and Employment Department of Proskauer Rose LLP – a defense-side employment law firm) have once again co-authored an article – THE TOP EMPLOYMENT CASES OF 2024 – for the California Lawyers Association and the California Labor & Employment Law Review. The article can be viewed here.

2025-08-21T10:17:28-08:00December 30th, 2024|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications|Comments Off on California Lawyers Association Publishes Law Review Article Co-Authored by Andrew H. Friedman

Southern California Best Lawyers 2025

Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman Recognized by Best Lawyers

“It is a tremendous honor to have been once again selected to the Best Lawyers’ list of top labor and employment law attorneys in Southern California,” Gregory D. Helmer

November 1, 2024 – Best Lawyers has selected Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman of Helmer Friedman LLP for inclusion in its ranking of the top labor and employment law attorneys in Southern California for 2025. “It is a tremendous honor to have been once again selected to the Best Lawyers’ list of top labor and employment law attorneys in Southern California,” Gregory D. Helmer commented.

For over 40 years, Best Lawyers has been widely regarded by lawyers and the public as the most reliable measure of legal integrity and distinction in the United States. Being recognized by Best Lawyers is a true testament to the excellence of one’s practice.

Southern California Best Lawyers 2025 - Labor and Employment Law.
2024-10-30T06:45:57-08:00October 30th, 2024|employment law|Comments Off on Southern California Best Lawyers 2025

Court of Appeal Rules Against Anthem/Elevance Health Attempt to Force Arbitration

Helmer Friedman LLP Defeats Anthem/Elevance Health’s Effort to Force Employee to Arbitrate

October 25, 2023 (Los Angeles, CA) – In a significant legal development, the California Court of Appeal has determined that Anthem Health, now operating as Elevance Health, cannot compel arbitration in the case involving long-term employee Mr. Gregory Antoniono. This ruling (Case B327595) from the Second Appellate District, Division 3, paves the way for the proceedings to continue in the Los Angeles County Superior Court before a judge and jury instead of an arbitrator.

“After litigating this issue for the better part of two years, we are pleased that the Court of Appeal reached what we believe to be the correct decision. When an individual is forced to arbitrate, they are giving up their fundamental constitutional right to a jury trial. As with all constitutional rights, we should analyze any waiver with an extremely high level of scrutiny.”

Following nearly two years of legal proceedings, the Los Angeles County Superior Court rejected Anthem/Elevance’s motion to enforce arbitration in March 2023 (Case No. 22STCV26362). The court ruled that the company failed to demonstrate that Mr. Antoniono agreed to arbitrate his claims, as he had not been provided the opportunity to review the arbitration policy terms when he signed his offer letter. Furthermore, the company’s intranet, where the policy was purportedly accessible, explicitly stated that the policies were not intended to form a legally binding contract.

The Court of Appeal upheld the court’s decision, emphasizing that Anthem/Elevance did not meet the “minimum” requirements for establishing an implied agreement to arbitrate. According to the Court, employers must “clearly communicate to the employee both that assenting to arbitration is a condition of employment and what the terms of the employer’s policy are.”

Anthem/Elevance’s argument that Mr. Antoniono implicitly agreed by signing an offer letter referencing the arbitration policy was dismissed due to the policy’s lack of attachment or accessible link. The Court highlighted that the arbitration policy was buried among numerous other non-contractual policies on the intranet.

Commenting on the decision, Gregory D. Helmer of Helmer Friedman LLP, representing Mr. Antoniono, remarked, “After litigating this issue for the better part of two years, we are pleased that the Court of Appeal reached what we believe to be the correct decision. When an individual is forced to arbitrate, they are giving up their fundamental constitutional right to a jury trial. As with all constitutional rights, we should analyze any waiver with an extremely high level of scrutiny.”

Helmer Friedman LLP advocates for employees’ rights in matters involving discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination and provides aggressive and innovative representation to safeguard clients’ rights.

Read more about the case Luis Ortiz vs Anthem Blue Cross, Elevence Health

Contact Information

Gregory D. Helmer
Helmer Friedman LLP
Phone: 310-396-7714
Email: ghelmer@helmerfriedman.com

2025-11-05T11:18:14-08:00October 24th, 2024|Case Update, employment law, Front Page News, Greg Helmer|Comments Off on Court of Appeal Rules Against Anthem/Elevance Health Attempt to Force Arbitration

Lawsuit Alleges Grindr Sold User Info Including Sexual Orientation and Location

Grindr allegedly sold a prominent Catholic priest’s sensitive personal information, causing him to lose his position as the general secretariat for the National Conference of U.S. bishops.

July 18, 2024 (Los Angeles) – Jeffrey Burrill subscribed to the Grindr app, which collected his sensitive personal data, including information about sexual orientation and location. Grindr failed to protect Burrill’s sensitive information and knowingly allowed it to be sold to third parties, according to a lawsuit filed by Helmer Friedman LLP and The Carr Law Group (Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 24STCV17896).

Grindr’s failure to protect sensitive personal data and its subsequent sale to third parties has caused immeasurable harm. Consumers deserve transparency and security,
especially when dealing with such private information.

Grindr, based in California, owns and operates a social networking application under federal trademark registration number 3873295. The application provides online chat rooms for social networking on the Internet and mobile devices, as well as computer dating services through adult personal advertisements and social networking on the Internet and mobile devices. Described as the “largest social networking app for gay, bi, trans, and queer people,” Grindr claims to have created a safe space to connect with the queer community.

In 2017, Mr. Burrill subscribed to Grindr, a gay social networking application. Grindr collected sensitive personal data from Mr. Burrill, including information about his sexual orientation and physical location. Between 2017 and 2021, the Catholic Laity and Clergy for Renewal (CLCR), a private foundation, purchased Mr. Burrill’s Grindr personal data and shared it with a publication called The Pillar.

In July 2021, The Pillar published an article using the Grindr data purchased from CLCR, outing Mr. Burrill and making false and lurid claims about him. This resulted in significant damage to Mr. Burrill’s reputation, leading to his resignation from the position of General Secretary of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and causing him significant financial and emotional distress.

Despite Grindr’s assurance of protecting customers’ personal data from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure, they failed to disclose the steps taken to protect sensitive personal data. This was aggravated by the former Chief Privacy Officer’s revelations that Grindr was aware of its failure to protect sensitive personal data but chose not to address the issue due to a lack of resources. When the former Chief Privacy Officer raised concerns about privacy violations, they were met with pushback and disdain from Grindr.

For more information about this lawsuit, please contact Gregory D. Helmer (at 310-396-7714 ext. 102  or ghelmer@helmerfriedman.com). James C.D. Carr (at 310-919-8057 or james@carrlawgrp.com)

Similarly, if you are a witness or have information that would be relevant to the claims of Mr. Burrill, please contact Mr. Helmer and/or Mr. Carr.

DOCUMENTS:

MEDIA COVERAGE:

2025-05-20T07:40:33-08:00July 22nd, 2024|California's Unfair Competition Law, Case Update, Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), fraud, Front Page News, Greg Helmer|Comments Off on Lawsuit Alleges Grindr Sold User Info Including Sexual Orientation and Location

Disability Discrimination, Harassment Lawsuit Filed Against Anthem Blue Cross

19-Year Veteran Employee of Anthem Blue Cross and Elevance Health Alleges that Healthcare Companies Fired Him During His Painful Recovery from Life-Threatening Heart Bypass Surgery

June 27, 2024 (BEVERLY HILLS, California) – Mr. Luis Ortiz, a long-term employee in the underwriting department of Anthem Blue Cross and Elevance Health, has filed a lawsuit alleging that he was discriminated against and harassed based on his medical condition and disability when the company fired him during his difficult recovery from open-heart surgery. Elevance Health, Inc., Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Blue Cross of California, the Elevance Health Companies of California, and several other related entities are named as defendants. (Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 24STCV15952). The Los Angeles law firm of Helmer Friedman LLP announced the filing today.

Plaintiff Luis Ortiz, a California resident, alleges that on February 17, 2022, after having undergone a coronary angiogram, he was immediately admitted to the hospital and underwent triple bypass surgery. His post-surgery recovery, he alleges, was difficult and rife with complications, including debilitating pain in his chest and back and radiating throughout his entire body.

It is illegal to discriminate against employees who are recovering from surgery, and it is disappointing to see these allegations arise in the healthcare industry – the very industry that people rely on for their health and well-being.

Mr. Ortiz alleges that he dutifully kept his employers updated and consistently submitted medical authorization to support his leave of absence. In August 2022, his doctors authorized an extension of his leave for six months. But, in an email of October 7, 2022, he was told by his supervisor, Ms. Millet-Riley, that his leave was unapproved. According to the complaint, she threatened that he would be terminated for “abandoning his job” if he did not contact her within three business days. Mr. Ortiz alleges that he contacted her immediately on the same day and told her that he was not abandoning his job and intended to return to work as soon as his doctors authorized him to do so. Nonetheless, on October 10, 2022, the complaint asserts that the defendants fired Mr. Ortiz for “job abandonment,” an explanation that Mr. Ortiz contends is a pretext for discrimination and unlawful conduct.

Mr. Ortiz further alleges that, after being fired, he applied for a vacant position in underwriting with Anthem Blue Cross of California (for which he was eminently qualified) but was denied that position. Mr. Ortiz alleges that such conduct was discriminatory and retaliatory. Commenting on California law, Gregory D. Helmer of Helmer Friedman LLP said, “It is illegal to discriminate against employees who are recovering from surgery, and it is disappointing to see these allegations arise in the healthcare industry – the very industry that people rely on for their health and well-being.”

For more information, contact Gregory D Helmer, Helmer Friedman LLP, (310) 396-7714 x102, ghelmer@helmerfriedman.com.

DOCUMENTS:

MEDIA COVERAGE:

2025-11-05T11:27:15-08:00June 27th, 2024|Case Update, disability discrimination, Front Page News, Greg Helmer, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, wrongful termination|Comments Off on Disability Discrimination, Harassment Lawsuit Filed Against Anthem Blue Cross

Labor & Employment Law Review Article Co-Authored by Andrew Friedman

Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi, Anthony J. Oncidi Author Article For the California Labor & Employment Law Review.

Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi, Anthony J. Oncidi Author Article For the California Labor & Employment Law Review

January 2024 – Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi (an employment law mediator with The Mizrahi Law Firm), and Anthony “Tony” J. Oncidi (a partner in and Co-Chair of the Labor and Employment Department of Proskauer Rose LLP – a defense-side employment law firm) have once again co-authored an article – THE TOP EMPLOYMENT CASES OF 2023 – for the California Lawyers Association and the California Labor & Employment Law Review. The article can be viewed here.

 

2025-07-30T10:40:10-08:00January 16th, 2024|Andrew Friedman, employment law, Front Page News, law review articles|Comments Off on Labor & Employment Law Review Article Co-Authored by Andrew Friedman

Andrew H. Friedman Super Lawyers Top 100

Andrew H. Friedman, of Helmer Friedman LLP, literally wrote the book about employment Law.

January 2024 – According to the California Bar Association, there are over 70,000 lawyers in the Southern California area. Helmer Friedman LLP is very pleased to announce that the lawyer rating service Super Lawyers has named Andrew H. Friedman to its list of the Top 100 attorneys in Southern California. The complete Top 100 list can be found here.

2024-01-16T10:04:36-08:00January 16th, 2024|employment law|Comments Off on Andrew H. Friedman Super Lawyers Top 100

Defeating Arbitration Clauses Article by Erin Kelly Published in Advocate Magazine

Advocate Magazine publishes article authored by Erin Kelly of Helmer Friedman LLP.

Big news! We’re thrilled to share that one of our very own attorneys, Erin Kelly, has been featured in the latest edition of Advocate Magazine! The article, titled “Discovery Aimed At Defeating An Arbitration Clause in Employment Cases,” is a fascinating read that highlights the importance of pre-hearing discovery in keeping a case in court. Erin offers some great tips and real-life examples on how to uncover evidence that can defeat a motion to compel arbitration.

Advocate Magazine is the largest magazine for plaintiffs’ trial attorneys in the United States and is owned by the Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles (CAALA). This is Erin’s second article to be published by the magazine – she’s really making waves in the industry! We’re so proud of her achievement and can’t wait to see what she does next.

 

2023-10-12T10:08:44-08:00October 12th, 2023|Arbitration Agreement, Erin Kelly, Labor & Employment Law|Comments Off on Defeating Arbitration Clauses Article by Erin Kelly Published in Advocate Magazine
Go to Top