Andrew Friedman 2026 Top 100 Super Lawyers

Andrew H. Friedman Named to Elite List of the Top 100 Lawyers in Southern California

March 1, 2026 – Los Angeles – Helmer Friedman LLP is extraordinarily pleased to announce that, out of the more than 100,000 attorneys in the Southern California area, the lawyer rating service Super Lawyers has named founding partner Andrew H. Friedman as a 2026 Top 100 Super Lawyer in Southern California. Commenting about Mr. Friedman’s selection to the Southern California Super Lawyers Top 100, Gregory D. Helmer said, “We couldn’t be prouder of this honor for our partner. Andrew has been named to the Top 100 since 2020 and his recognition is well-deserved.”

Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the Top 100 attorneys in Southern California via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. Southern California lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Southern California Super Lawyers Top Lists.

“Recognition as a Top 100 Super Lawyer for 2026 is an enormous honor,” Andrew H. Friedman said, “and I am quite thankful for the recognition and for the ability to represents employees and consumers who have been treated illegally by large corporate and governmental entities. I was extremely gratified to recently team up with Courtney Abrams of Courtney Abrams, P.C. and David de Rubertis of deRubertis Law Firm and recover a $6 Million jury verdict on behalf of our client in a gender discrimination and harassment lawsuit.”

Representing employees (both individual employees and class and collective actions comprised of multiple individuals), Andrew’s cases involve every variety of employment claim from harassment and discrimination to retaliation and whistle-blowing actions to wage and hour matters to religious and disability accommodation cases. Mr. Friedman not only litigates these cases but he has prevailed at trial in sexual harassment/retaliation and fraud and breach of contract cases including, with Tony Lewis of The Lewis Law Firm, a $4.1 Million jury verdict in the Los Angeles Superior Court and with his law partner, Gregory D. Helmer, in a jury very in favor of their client sexual harassment in the Orange County Superior Court.

Mr. Friedman has also prevailed in precedent-setting appeals, including serving as Counsel of Record in Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp. et. al. (Case No. 10-56068) where he successfully convinced the U. S. Supreme Court to grant the petition for certiorari that he filed on behalf of his clients. In January 2017, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, reversed the Ninth Circuit and ruled in favor of Mr. Friedman’s clients.

2026-03-19T09:30:40-08:00March 19th, 2026|Andrew Friedman|Comments Off on Andrew Friedman 2026 Top 100 Super Lawyers

Elevance Health Sued for Disability Discrimination

Health Insurance Giant Anthem/Elevance Fires Veteran Nurse of 17 Years Who Suffers from Debilitating Nerve Disease — After Repeatedly Refusing Her Accommodation Requests and Punishing Her for Making Them

Helmer Friedman LLP & The Carr Law Group Represent Former Elevance Health, Inc. Employee Priscilla Kamoi Accusing Anthem Blue Cross and Elevance Health, Inc. of Illegal Employment Practices

March 16, 2026 (Los Angeles, California) – Priscilla Kamoi, a licensed Registered Nurse and a 17-year veteran of Anthem Blue Cross and Elevance Health, has filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court. She alleges that the healthcare giant discriminated against her based on her disability and medical condition, refused to provide reasonable accommodations, retaliated against her for requesting those accommodations, and ultimately terminated her employment. The defendants named in the lawsuit include Elevance Health, Inc., Blue Cross of California, and other related entities, as well as several individual supervisors. (Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 26STCV08319). The lawsuit was announced today by the Los Angeles law firms of Helmer Friedman LLP and The Carr Law Group.

According to the complaint, Ms. Kamoi began her employment with the defendants (then known as “Wellpoint”) in August 2008 as a case management nurse in Woodland Hills, California. Throughout her 17 years with the company, her performance was exemplary—she received regular salary increases, annual bonuses, and consistently strong performance evaluations.

The law is clear: an employer cannot penalize a disabled employee for being disabled, nor can it refuse to provide simple accommodations—like a little extra time—and then use the employee’s resulting ‘performance deficiency’ as a pretext for dismissal. That is precisely what the law against disability discrimination seeks to prevent.

In her complaint, Ms. Kamoi alleges that beginning in late 2018, she developed a debilitating condition known as severe trigeminal neuralgia, which caused excruciating, electric-shock-like pain radiating into her head and face, as well as difficulties with speaking, chewing, swallowing, and sleeping. In a January 2023 email to her supervisors, she included photographs of herself during a pain episode, describing the ordeal as so severe that she could not eat dinner until after 11:00 p.m., when the pain finally subsided.

There is a cruel irony in a major health insurance company—one that profits from the healthcare system—showing such little regard for the health and dignity of a nurse who has dedicated 17 years to caring for its members.

The complaint outlines a relentless cycle spanning nearly three years: the defendants imposed stringent new hourly productivity quotas on Ms. Kamoi, then disciplined her when her disability prevented her from meeting those quotas. They subsequently refused her repeated requests for reasonable accommodations and then disciplined her again. According to the complaint, when Ms. Kamoi disclosed her limitations to a supervisor, she was told, “Then get another job.” After her physician submitted a formal accommodation request in May 2024—asking only for necessary breaks and additional time to complete assignments during pain episodes—the defendants denied the request within two weeks.

Ms. Kamoi alleges a pattern of escalating retaliation: productivity standards were increased again in January 2025; her performance was monitored on a stringent weekly basis, while other nurses were reviewed monthly; and on May 22, 2025, she was summoned to a meeting and fired. The complaint also states that Ms. Kamoi, as a Kenyan-born Black woman, experienced discrimination based on her race and national origin.

Current and former employees of Anthem Blue Cross, Blue Cross of California, or Elevance Health, Inc. who wish to report their work experiences or learn more about the lawsuit should complete a case evaluation form.

Commenting on California law, Gregory Helmer of Helmer Friedman LLP stated, “The law is clear: an employer cannot penalize a disabled employee for being disabled, nor can it refuse to provide simple accommodations—like a little extra time—and then use the employee’s resulting ‘performance deficiency’ as a pretext for dismissal. That is precisely what the law against disability discrimination seeks to prevent.” James Carr added, “There is a cruel irony in a major health insurance company—one that profits from the healthcare system—showing such little regard for the health and dignity of a nurse who has dedicated 17 years to caring for its members.”

For more information about this lawsuit, please contact Gregory Helmer of Helmer Friedman LLP at (310-396-7714 or ghelmer@helmerfriedman.com) or James Carr of The Carr Law Group at (310-919-8057 or james@carrlawgrp.com).

Similarly, if you are a witness or have information that would be relevant to the claims of Ms. Kamoi, please contact Mr. Helmer and/or Mr. Carr.

 

DOCUMENTS:

MEDIA COVERAGE

The Journal Of The Litigation

The Journal Of The Litigation Section Of The California Lawyers Association Publishes Article Co-Authored By Andrew H. Friedman

January 7, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to congratulate partner Andrew H. Friedman and his co-author, Anthony Oncidi of Proskauer Rose LLP on the publication of their latest law review article – The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act. CLA Dec2025.The Ending Forced Arbitration Of Sexual Assault And Sexual Harassment Act: Four Years Fraught With Confusion And Litigation.

2026-01-12T12:54:06-08:00January 12th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, Arbitration Agreement, employment law publications, sexual harassment|Comments Off on The Journal Of The Litigation

Top Employment Cases of 2025

California Law & Employment Law Review Publishes Article Co-Authored By Andrew H. Friedman

Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi, Tony Oncidi contribute articles to California Labor & Employment Law Review, Top Employment Cases of 2025.

January 7, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to congratulate partner Andrew H. Friedman and his co-authors Anthony Oncidi and Ramit Mizrahi on the publication of their latest law review article – The Top Employment Cases of 2025 by the California Labor & Employment Law Review.

2026-01-09T09:01:13-08:00January 7th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications, hostile work environment, Labor & Employment Law, law review articles, Wage & Hour Violations|Comments Off on Top Employment Cases of 2025

Groundbreaking Employment Law Treatise

Andrew H. Friedman 2026 Litigating Employment Discrimination Cases.

Helmer Friedman LLP is thrilled to announce that the 2026 edition of Andrew H. Friedman’s ground-breaking two-volume employment law treatise – Litigating Employment Discrimination Cases (James Publishing – 2005-2026) was just published by James Publishing.

 

Mr. Friedman is extremely thankful to his Editor, Lisa Dunne, and to his Contributing Authors – Ted Cohen, Anthony Oncidi, and Alan Reinach. The treatise is ready to be ordered at https://jamespublishing.com/product/litigating-employment-discrimination-cases/

2026-01-09T09:16:31-08:00January 6th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications|Comments Off on Groundbreaking Employment Law Treatise

McDonnell Douglas: The End Is Near? by Andrew H. Friedman

California Labor & Employment Law Review Publishes Cover Article By Andrew H. Friedman

September 1, 2025 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to announce that the California Labor & Employment Law Review has just published Andrew H. Friedman’s article – MCDONNELL DOUGLAS: THE END IS NEAR? – as the cover article for its September 2025 issue. Sadly, the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test, which was originally established to help plaintiff employees prove discrimination, has increasingly become an employer’s best friend enabling them to obtain summary judgment in so many clearly meritorious cases that even the conservative Justices believe that the time has come to end or, at least, curtail its use at summary judgment.This article explores the increasingly ostentatious charge by a duo of uber conservative Justices – Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch – to reverse or dramatically curtail the use of the tripartite burden-shifting test first announced by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), for the most unlikely of reasons. Justices Thomas and Gorsuch contend that the McDonnell Douglas test is too employer-friendly because it not only “requires a plaintiff to prove too much at summary judgment” but also that it “fails to encompass the various ways in which a plaintiff could prove his claim.” In their dissent in Hittle v. City of Stockton, California, 145 S.Ct. 759, 759-764 (2025) (J. Thomas and J. Gorsuch, dissenting) and their concurrence in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, 145 S.Ct. 1540, 1548-1555 (2025)(J. Thomas and J. Gorsuch, concurring), Justices Thomas and Gorsuch also criticize the use of McDonnell Douglas on motions for summary judgment for a whole host of additional reasons:

  • McDonnell Douglas is not grounded in the text of Title VII or any other source of law – rather, it is a judicially manufactured doctrine and, as such, generates complexity and confusion which cause erroneous results.
  • McDonnell Douglas is incompatible with the summary-judgment standard set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
  • McDonnell Douglas requires courts to draw and maintain artificial distinctions between direct and circumstantial evidence.

Commenting on the publication of his article, Mr. Friedman said: “Sadly, the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test, which was originally established to help plaintiff employees prove discrimination, has increasingly become an employer’s best friend enabling them to obtain summary judgment in so many clearly meritorious cases that even the conservative Justices believe that the time has come to end or, at least, curtail its use at summary judgment.”

If you enjoy Mr. Friedman’s article and you are not currently a member of the Labor and Employment Law Section of the California Lawyer’s Association, you should consider joining at https://calawyers.org/join-the-labor-and-employment-law-section/. As a member of the Labor and Employment Law Section, you will receive every issue of the California Labor and Employment Law Review – a leading resource for staying up-to-date on all the latest developments in Labor and Employment Law. You will also receive member only discounts not only to the Section’s live and ondemand webinars but also for the Section’s flagship programs including:

  • New Employment Practitioner Conference
  • Annual Public Sector Conference
  • Annual Labor and Employment Law Conference
  • Annual Advanced Wage and Hour Conference
  • Annual Advanced Mediation Conference
2025-09-02T09:37:30-08:00September 1st, 2025|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications|Comments Off on McDonnell Douglas: The End Is Near? by Andrew H. Friedman

Superior Court Success: Compel Arbitration Defeated

Courtney Abrams, Erin Kelly, Andrew Friedman, Superior Court Victory defeating compel arbitration.

Helmer Friedman LLP is thrilled to extend our heartfelt congratulations to our co-counsel, Erin Kelly, for her remarkable oral argument before the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District. Together, we achieved a significant victory at the Superior Court level, successfully defeating an employer’s motion to compel arbitration—a decision the employer has since appealed. Erin, alongside our talented team members, Courtney Abrams and Andrew H. Friedman, diligently prepared our opposition to this appeal, and we are feeling optimistic that the Second Appellate District will uphold the Superior Court’s ruling. If our hopes materialize, it will mark our fifth consecutive triumph in overcoming motions to compel arbitration, demonstrating our commitment to justice.

We are also excited by the momentum surrounding the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, which empowers employees to opt out of enforced arbitration in cases of harassment and assault. We strongly encourage Congress to support the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act. This critical legislation would prevent predispute arbitration agreements from being valid or enforceable in employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights disputes, paving the way for fairer outcomes. Let’s continue to advocate for justice together!

2025-06-25T09:01:15-08:00June 25th, 2025|Arbitration Agreement, Erin Kelly, Front Page News|Comments Off on Superior Court Success: Compel Arbitration Defeated

Andrew H. Friedman Named to Elite List of the Top 100 Lawyers in Southern California

March 1, 2025 – Los Angeles – Helmer Friedman LLP is very pleased to announce that, out of the more than 100,000 attorneys in the Southern California area, the lawyer rating service Super Lawyers has named founding partner Andrew H. Friedman as a 2025 Top 100 Super Lawyer in Southern California. Commenting about Mr. Friedman’s selection to the Southern California Super Lawyers Top 100, Gregory D. Helmer said, “We couldn’t be prouder of this honor for our partner. Andrew has been named to the Top 100 since 2020 and his recognition is well-deserved.”

We couldn’t be prouder of this honor for our partner. Andrew has been named to the Top 100 since 2020 and his recognition is well-deserved.

Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the Top 100 attorneys in Southern California via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. Southern California lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Southern California Super Lawyers Top Lists.

“Recognition as a Top 100 Super Lawyer for 2025 is a huge honor,” Andrew H. Friedman said, “and I am quite thankful for the recognition and for the ability to represents employees and consumers who have been treated illegally by large corporate and governmental entities.”

Representing employees (both individual employees and class and collective actions comprised of multiple individuals), Andrew’s cases involve every variety of employment claim from harassment and discrimination to retaliation and whistle-blowing actions to wage and hour matters to religious and disability accommodation cases. Mr. Friedman not only litigates these cases but he has prevailed at trial in sexual harassment/retaliation and fraud and breach of contract cases including, with Tony Lewis of The Lewis Law Firm, a $4.1 Million jury verdict in the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Mr. Friedman has also prevailed in precedent-setting appeals, including serving as Counsel of Record in Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp. et. al. (Case No. 10-56068) where he successfully convinced the U. S. Supreme Court to grant the petition for certiorari that he filed on behalf of his clients. In January 2017, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, reversed the Ninth Circuit and ruled in favor of Mr. Friedman’s clients.

Recognition as a Top 100 Super Lawyer for 2025 is a huge honor,” Andrew H. Friedman said, “and I am quite thankful for the recognition and for the ability to represents employees and consumers who have been treated illegally by large corporate and governmental entities.

Mr. Friedman has received the highest possible rating from Martindale-Hubble, indicating that he is ranked at the highest level of professional excellence with “very high to preeminent legal ability” and “very high” ethical standards as established by confidential opinions from members of the Bar.

For multiple years, Chambers USA, the Nation’s leading legal data and analytics provider, has awarded Mr. Friedman with its highest possible rating (“Band 1”) for Labor & Employment – see https://chambers.com/lawyer/andrew-h-friedman-usa-5:25940936. According to a review published in Chambers USA, “Andrew Friedman of Helmer Friedman is recognized among peers for his work representing both individuals and classes in a variety of matters, ranging from harassment to wage and hour suits. ‘He’s an excellent plaintiff lawyer who offers a really good perspective.’”

Mr. Friedman is also widely acclaimed for writing the definitive employment law treatise – Litigating Employment Discrimination Cases (James Publishing – 2005 – 2025), https://jamespublishing.com/product/litigating-employment-discrimination-cases/ – which is widely used by practitioners from both the plaintiff and management sides of the employment law bar.

2026-01-06T08:46:02-08:00February 28th, 2025|employment law|Comments Off on Andrew H. Friedman Named to Elite List of the Top 100 Lawyers in Southern California

Super Lawyers Names Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman as 2025 Super Lawyers

Andrew Friedman, Greg Helmer named Super Lawyer Top 100 2025.February 20, 2025 – Los Angeles – Helmer Friedman LLP is very pleased to announce that the lawyer rating service Super Lawyers has named founding partners Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman as 2025 Super Lawyers. Using its patented multiphase selection process (U.S. Pat. No. 8,412,564), Super Lawyers annually creates a comprehensive and diverse listing of the top 5% of attorneys in various practice areas, such as employment law. “It is a tremendous honor to have been once again named by Super Lawyers to its list of the top 5% of all of the labor and employment law attorneys in Southern California,” Gregory D. Helmer commented, “Super Lawyers has been recognizing us since 2006 and we couldn’t be prouder of this accomplishment.” “We are also very proud that two of our amazing co-counsel – Charles T. Mathews and Courtney Abrams – have also been recognized as 2025 Super Lawyers,” Andrew H. Friedman added.

2025-10-23T10:55:19-08:00February 25th, 2025|employment law, Front Page News|Comments Off on Super Lawyers Names Gregory D. Helmer and Andrew H. Friedman as 2025 Super Lawyers

Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California Publishes Article By Andrew H. Friedman

Andrew Friedman and Erin Kelly article published February 2025 Advocate Magazine.

February 1, 2025 – Helmer Friedman LLP congratulates partner Andrew H. Friedman and former Helmer Friedman LLP attorney Erin Kelly on the publication of their article – “The best and worst employment cases of 2024 – A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE CASES THAT SHAPED THE YEAR IN EMPLOYMENT LAW (WITH A BIT OF COLOR COMMENTARY) – in the Advocate Journal (a publication of the Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California – February 2025).  Click here to read the article.

2025-02-11T11:08:52-08:00February 1st, 2025|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications, Erin Kelly|Comments Off on Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California Publishes Article By Andrew H. Friedman
Go to Top