About Staff

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Staff has created 183 blog entries.

CSU to Pay $12 Million to Settle Gender Harassment and Retaliation Cases

The settlement is believed to be one of the largest employment discrimination settlements against the nation’s largest public university system.

CSU $12 Million Settlement gender harassment, discrimination.

LOS ANGELES, May 12, 2026 — California State University will pay $12 million to resolve gender harassment and retaliation claims brought by Helmer Friedman LLP on behalf of two former high-level administrators at Cal State San Bernardino. The settlement follows a landmark $6 million Los Angeles jury verdict in October 2025 that found CSU liable for retaliating against and harassing Dr. Anissa Rogers and failing to prevent that harassment. The settlement is believed to be the largest publicly reported employment discrimination settlement against the CSU system, the nation’s largest four-year public university system.

The litigation unfolded against the backdrop of broader public scrutiny involving CSU’s handling of workplace harassment complaints across multiple campuses. Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued throughout the proceedings that the evidence reflected longstanding structural issues within the university system.

“Meaningful accountability only happens when organizations are willing to confront these problems directly.”

The settlement, which was recently finalized, resolves claims brought by Dr. Clare Weber, the former Vice Provost of Academic Affairs at CSU San Bernardino, and Dr. Anissa Rogers, the former Associate Dean at CSU’s Palm Desert campus. A Los Angeles jury previously awarded Rogers $6 million after finding CSU retaliated against her, subjected her to gender harassment, and failed to prevent that harassment in violation of California law.

Weber’s related claims were to be set for a second trial but ultimately resolved as part of the broader settlement agreement.

Lead trial counsel David J. deRubertis of The deRubertis Law Firm APC said the settlement marks the conclusion of years of litigation exposing systemic failures within the nation’s largest public university system.

“From the beginning, these cases were about accountability,” said deRubertis. “Dr. Weber and D. Rogers took enormous professional and personal risks in challenging conduct they believed was unlawful. The result sends a strong message about the importance of protecting employees who speak up about harassment against retaliation.”

“These cases highlighted the real human cost of retaliation in academic institutions,” added Andrew H. Friedman of Helmer Friedman LLP. “Meaningful accountability only happens when organizations are willing to confront these problems directly.”

The lawsuits alleged that CSU leadership, including President Tomas Morales and other senior campus administrators, presided over a hostile environment for women, where complaints regarding gender inequity, harassment, and retaliation were ignored or punished. According to the plaintiffs, Weber was fired shortly after formally raising concerns regarding unequal pay between male and female administrators. At the same time, Rogers alleged she was forced out after reporting harassment and retaliation to high-level executives at the CSU and to HR. Weber is set to retire from CSU after more than 25 years of service within the university system.

“This resolution reflects the courage of two women who refused to stay silent and were punished, including being forced out of their jobs, for doing so.”

Trial testimony underscored those failures. CSU San Bernardino’s Provost, Rafik Mohamed, admitted at trial that when faculty brought him allegations of gender harassment by a senior dean, he viewed the complaints as “low-grade bias” and did not report them to Human Resources or Title IX — despite conceding he was a mandated reporter required to do so.

The second trial, which had been expected to feature testimony from several of the same senior CSU officials who testified on behalf of CSU in the Rogers trial, was resolved prior to a trial date being set.

The plaintiffs were represented by Andrew H. Friedman of Helmer Friedman LLP, Courtney Abrams of Courtney Abrams, PC, and David J. deRubertis of The deRubertis Law Firm APC.

“This resolution reflects the courage of two women who refused to stay silent and were punished, including being forced out of their jobs, for doing so,” said Abrams. “CSU’s own Provost admitted at trial that he viewed faculty complaints of gender harassment as ‘low-grade bias’ and bypassed Human Resources. That wasn’t a misunderstanding — it was a choice. CSU spent years protecting harassers instead of the women they harmed, and $12 million is the price tag on that cover-up.”

The cases are Weber and Rogers v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 23STCV05549.

Read more at https://www.helmerfriedman.com/calstate-university-sued-for-gender-discrimination/.

2026-05-19T09:18:24-08:00May 15th, 2026|Case Update, discrimination, Front Page News, gender discrimination, hostile work environment, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, retaliation, Settlement, sexual harassment, wrongful termination|Comments Off on CSU to Pay $12 Million to Settle Gender Harassment and Retaliation Cases

CLA Conference

Andrew H. Friedman Speaking At California Lawyers Association Conference

42 Annual California Law Association Labor & Employment

July 24, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is please to announce that Andrew H. Friedman has been invited to speak at the California Lawyers Association’s Labor & Employment Law Section’s 42nd Labor & Employment Law Annual Conference on July 24, 2026 taking place at the Hilton Pasadena Hotel located at 168 S. Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101. The Labor & Employment Law Section will also be holding its 16th Annual Advanced Wage and Hour Conference the day before (on July 23, 2026).

Mr. Friedman will be speaking with his longtime speaking partner and nemesis – Anthony Oncidi of Proskauer – on Employment Law Year In Review. The Labor & Employment Law Section describes their panel as follows: “In this fast-paced presentation, Anthony J. Oncidi and Andrew H. Friedman will once again cover the top employment law cases from the past year, with an emphasis on the cases of greatest utility to employment law practitioners.”

For more information or to register for this conference, go to https://calawyers.org/2026-wham/schedule/.

2026-05-06T11:05:09-08:00May 6th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, speaking engagements|Comments Off on CLA Conference

Elevate Your Employment Law Game

Andrew H. Friedman Speaking At Prominent Defense Employment Law Firm’s Annual Client Conference

March 19, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is very pleased to announce that Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, one of California’s elite employment law defense firms, has invited Andrew H. Friedman to speak at its 26th Annual Employment Law Conference – “Elevate Your Employment Law Game.”

“It is a real honor to be invited to speak at a management-side law firm’s client conference,” Mr. Friedman commented. “The better plaintiff and defense counsel understand and get to know (and, hopefully, like) one another, the better it is for our clients and our legal system.”

AALRR, Elevate Your Employment Game featured speaker Andrew H Friedman.

AALRR describes the panel on which Mr. Friedman will speak as follows: “A must-see panel discussion featuring experienced members of the plaintiff bar offering candid perspectives on what makes a strong plaintiff’s case—and the mitigation steps employers should be taking.”

“It is a real honor to be invited to speak at a management-side law firm’s client conference,” Mr. Friedman commented. “The better plaintiff and defense counsel understand and get to know (and, hopefully, like) one another, the better it is for our clients and our legal system.”

2026-03-23T09:08:23-08:00March 20th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, speaking engagements|Comments Off on Elevate Your Employment Law Game

Andrew Friedman 2026 Top 100 Super Lawyers

Andrew H. Friedman Named to Elite List of the Top 100 Lawyers in Southern California

March 1, 2026 – Los Angeles – Helmer Friedman LLP is extraordinarily pleased to announce that, out of the more than 100,000 attorneys in the Southern California area, the lawyer rating service Super Lawyers has named founding partner Andrew H. Friedman as a 2026 Top 100 Super Lawyer in Southern California. Commenting about Mr. Friedman’s selection to the Southern California Super Lawyers Top 100, Gregory D. Helmer said, “We couldn’t be prouder of this honor for our partner. Andrew has been named to the Top 100 since 2020 and his recognition is well-deserved.”

Each year, Super Lawyers recognizes the Top 100 attorneys in Southern California via a patented multiphase selection process involving peer nomination, independent research and peer evaluation. Southern California lawyers who receive the highest point totals during this selection process are further recognized in Southern California Super Lawyers Top Lists.

“Recognition as a Top 100 Super Lawyer for 2026 is an enormous honor,” Andrew H. Friedman said, “and I am quite thankful for the recognition and for the ability to represents employees and consumers who have been treated illegally by large corporate and governmental entities. I was extremely gratified to recently team up with Courtney Abrams of Courtney Abrams, P.C. and David de Rubertis of deRubertis Law Firm and recover a $6 Million jury verdict on behalf of our client in a gender discrimination and harassment lawsuit.”

Representing employees (both individual employees and class and collective actions comprised of multiple individuals), Andrew’s cases involve every variety of employment claim from harassment and discrimination to retaliation and whistle-blowing actions to wage and hour matters to religious and disability accommodation cases. Mr. Friedman not only litigates these cases but he has prevailed at trial in sexual harassment/retaliation and fraud and breach of contract cases including, with Tony Lewis of The Lewis Law Firm, a $4.1 Million jury verdict in the Los Angeles Superior Court and with his law partner, Gregory D. Helmer, in a jury very in favor of their client sexual harassment in the Orange County Superior Court.

Mr. Friedman has also prevailed in precedent-setting appeals, including serving as Counsel of Record in Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp. et. al. (Case No. 10-56068) where he successfully convinced the U. S. Supreme Court to grant the petition for certiorari that he filed on behalf of his clients. In January 2017, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, reversed the Ninth Circuit and ruled in favor of Mr. Friedman’s clients.

2026-03-19T09:30:40-08:00March 19th, 2026|Andrew Friedman|Comments Off on Andrew Friedman 2026 Top 100 Super Lawyers

Elevance Health Sued for Disability Discrimination

Health Insurance Giant Anthem/Elevance Fires Veteran Nurse of 17 Years Who Suffers from Debilitating Nerve Disease — After Repeatedly Refusing Her Accommodation Requests and Punishing Her for Making Them

Helmer Friedman LLP & The Carr Law Group Represent Former Elevance Health, Inc. Employee Priscilla Kamoi Accusing Anthem Blue Cross and Elevance Health, Inc. of Illegal Employment Practices

March 16, 2026 (Los Angeles, California) – Priscilla Kamoi, a licensed Registered Nurse and a 17-year veteran of Anthem Blue Cross and Elevance Health, has filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court. She alleges that the healthcare giant discriminated against her based on her disability and medical condition, refused to provide reasonable accommodations, retaliated against her for requesting those accommodations, and ultimately terminated her employment. The defendants named in the lawsuit include Elevance Health, Inc., Blue Cross of California, and other related entities, as well as several individual supervisors. (Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 26STCV08319). The lawsuit was announced today by the Los Angeles law firms of Helmer Friedman LLP and The Carr Law Group.

According to the complaint, Ms. Kamoi began her employment with the defendants (then known as “Wellpoint”) in August 2008 as a case management nurse in Woodland Hills, California. Throughout her 17 years with the company, her performance was exemplary—she received regular salary increases, annual bonuses, and consistently strong performance evaluations.

The law is clear: an employer cannot penalize a disabled employee for being disabled, nor can it refuse to provide simple accommodations—like a little extra time—and then use the employee’s resulting ‘performance deficiency’ as a pretext for dismissal. That is precisely what the law against disability discrimination seeks to prevent.

In her complaint, Ms. Kamoi alleges that beginning in late 2018, she developed a debilitating condition known as severe trigeminal neuralgia, which caused excruciating, electric-shock-like pain radiating into her head and face, as well as difficulties with speaking, chewing, swallowing, and sleeping. In a January 2023 email to her supervisors, she included photographs of herself during a pain episode, describing the ordeal as so severe that she could not eat dinner until after 11:00 p.m., when the pain finally subsided.

There is a cruel irony in a major health insurance company—one that profits from the healthcare system—showing such little regard for the health and dignity of a nurse who has dedicated 17 years to caring for its members.

The complaint outlines a relentless cycle spanning nearly three years: the defendants imposed stringent new hourly productivity quotas on Ms. Kamoi, then disciplined her when her disability prevented her from meeting those quotas. They subsequently refused her repeated requests for reasonable accommodations and then disciplined her again. According to the complaint, when Ms. Kamoi disclosed her limitations to a supervisor, she was told, “Then get another job.” After her physician submitted a formal accommodation request in May 2024—asking only for necessary breaks and additional time to complete assignments during pain episodes—the defendants denied the request within two weeks.

Ms. Kamoi alleges a pattern of escalating retaliation: productivity standards were increased again in January 2025; her performance was monitored on a stringent weekly basis, while other nurses were reviewed monthly; and on May 22, 2025, she was summoned to a meeting and fired. The complaint also states that Ms. Kamoi, as a Kenyan-born Black woman, experienced discrimination based on her race and national origin.

Current and former employees of Anthem Blue Cross, Blue Cross of California, or Elevance Health, Inc. who wish to report their work experiences or learn more about the lawsuit should complete a case evaluation form.

Commenting on California law, Gregory Helmer of Helmer Friedman LLP stated, “The law is clear: an employer cannot penalize a disabled employee for being disabled, nor can it refuse to provide simple accommodations—like a little extra time—and then use the employee’s resulting ‘performance deficiency’ as a pretext for dismissal. That is precisely what the law against disability discrimination seeks to prevent.” James Carr added, “There is a cruel irony in a major health insurance company—one that profits from the healthcare system—showing such little regard for the health and dignity of a nurse who has dedicated 17 years to caring for its members.”

For more information about this lawsuit, please contact Gregory Helmer of Helmer Friedman LLP at (310-396-7714 or ghelmer@helmerfriedman.com) or James Carr of The Carr Law Group at (310-919-8057 or james@carrlawgrp.com).

Similarly, if you are a witness or have information that would be relevant to the claims of Ms. Kamoi, please contact Mr. Helmer and/or Mr. Carr.

 

DOCUMENTS:

MEDIA COVERAGE

Mastering the Deposition 101: The Nuts and Bolts

Andrew H. Friedman to Speak on Mastering the Deposition 101: The Nuts and Bolts

Tuesday, March 10, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to announce that Andrew H. Friedman will speak at Pincus Professional Education’s “Mastering the Deposition 101: The Nuts and Bolts” Program on Tuesday and Wednesday, March 10 & 11, 2026.

Mr. Friedman will be speaking with Jesse Lanier on a “Witness Preparation” panel.

To register for the Mastering the Deposition 101: The Nuts and Bolts program or to learn more about it, visit – https://new.pincusproed.com/product/mastering-the-deposition-101-the-nuts-and-bolts-ca-two-part-webinar-watch-live-or-via-ondemand-streaming/

2026-02-25T08:47:37-08:00February 25th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, speaking engagements|Comments Off on Mastering the Deposition 101: The Nuts and Bolts

New Employment Law Practitioners

Andrew H. Friedman to Speak at New Employment Practitioner Conference

February 6, 2026 – Andrew H. Friedman will be speaking at the California Lawyers Association’s Labor and Employment Law Section’s annual New Employment Law Practitioner Conference.

Andrew Friedman Speaking about Employment Law.Mr. Friedman will be speaking on a panel entitled “Motion Practice from A to Z” along with Janine Braxton (a Partner at Meyers Nave Riback Silver & Wilson) and the Honorable Judge Rebekah Evenson (Judge on the Alameda County Superior Court). This panel will provide an overview of different types of motions and walk participants through the entire lifecycle of a motion, with a focus on drafting and arguing motions effectively.

To learn more about this Conference or to register, go to https://calawyers.org/2026-new-employment-law-practitioner-conference/

 

2026-02-23T10:58:47-08:00January 13th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, speaking engagements|Comments Off on New Employment Law Practitioners

The Journal Of The Litigation

The Journal Of The Litigation Section Of The California Lawyers Association Publishes Article Co-Authored By Andrew H. Friedman

January 7, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to congratulate partner Andrew H. Friedman and his co-author, Anthony Oncidi of Proskauer Rose LLP on the publication of their latest law review article – The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act. CLA Dec2025.The Ending Forced Arbitration Of Sexual Assault And Sexual Harassment Act: Four Years Fraught With Confusion And Litigation.

2026-01-12T12:54:06-08:00January 12th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, Arbitration Agreement, employment law publications, sexual harassment|Comments Off on The Journal Of The Litigation

Debate at Beverly Hills Bar Association

Andrew H. Friedman to Debate Tony Oncidi at a Beverly Hills Bar Association Event

January 29, 2026 – Andrew H. Friedman will be debating Tony Oncidi at an event sponsored by the Labor and Employment Law Section of the Beverly Hills Bar Association.

The Beverly Hills Bar describes this event as follows: “Employment law continues to evolve at a rapid pace—and 2025 was no exception. This engaging session will highlight the most influential appellate decisions of the year from the U.S. and California Supreme Courts, the Ninth Circuit, and California Courts of Appeal, and unpack their practical implications for practitioners.”

To learn more about this event or to register, go to https://myemail.constantcontact.com/2025-Employment-Law-Year-In-Review.html?soid=1102591689817&aid=AiJ2op_EUck.

 

2026-01-12T11:24:09-08:00January 12th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, Labor & Employment Law, speaking engagements|Comments Off on Debate at Beverly Hills Bar Association

Top Employment Cases of 2025

California Law & Employment Law Review Publishes Article Co-Authored By Andrew H. Friedman

Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi, Tony Oncidi contribute articles to California Labor & Employment Law Review, Top Employment Cases of 2025.

January 7, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to congratulate partner Andrew H. Friedman and his co-authors Anthony Oncidi and Ramit Mizrahi on the publication of their latest law review article – The Top Employment Cases of 2025 by the California Labor & Employment Law Review.

2026-01-09T09:01:13-08:00January 7th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications, hostile work environment, Labor & Employment Law, law review articles, Wage & Hour Violations|Comments Off on Top Employment Cases of 2025
Go to Top