About Staff

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Staff has created 177 blog entries.

New Employment Law Practitioners

Andrew H. Friedman to Speak at New Employment Practitioner Conference

February 6, 2026 – Andrew H. Friedman will be speaking at the California Lawyers Association’s Labor and Employment Law Section’s annual New Employment Law Practitioner Conference.

Andrew Friedman Speaking about Employment Law.Mr. Friedman will be speaking on a panel entitled “Motion Practice from A to Z” along with Janine Braxton (a Partner at Meyers Nave Riback Silver & Wilson) and the Honorable Judge Rebekah Evenson (Judge on the Alameda County Superior Court). This panel will provide an overview of different types of motions and walk participants through the entire lifecycle of a motion, with a focus on drafting and arguing motions effectively.

To learn more about this Conference or to register, go to https://calawyers.org/2026-new-employment-law-practitioner-conference/

 

2026-01-13T11:05:22-08:00January 13th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, speaking engagements|Comments Off on New Employment Law Practitioners

The Journal Of The Litigation

The Journal Of The Litigation Section Of The California Lawyers Association Publishes Article Co-Authored By Andrew H. Friedman

January 7, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to congratulate partner Andrew H. Friedman and his co-author, Anthony Oncidi of Proskauer Rose LLP on the publication of their latest law review article – The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act. CLA Dec2025.The Ending Forced Arbitration Of Sexual Assault And Sexual Harassment Act: Four Years Fraught With Confusion And Litigation.

2026-01-12T12:54:06-08:00January 12th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, Arbitration Agreement, employment law publications, sexual harassment|Comments Off on The Journal Of The Litigation

Debate at Beverly Hills Bar Association

Andrew H. Friedman to Debate Tony Oncidi at a Beverly Hills Bar Association Event

January 29, 2026 – Andrew H. Friedman will be debating Tony Oncidi at an event sponsored by the Labor and Employment Law Section of the Beverly Hills Bar Association.

The Beverly Hills Bar describes this event as follows: “Employment law continues to evolve at a rapid pace—and 2025 was no exception. This engaging session will highlight the most influential appellate decisions of the year from the U.S. and California Supreme Courts, the Ninth Circuit, and California Courts of Appeal, and unpack their practical implications for practitioners.”

To learn more about this event or to register, go to https://myemail.constantcontact.com/2025-Employment-Law-Year-In-Review.html?soid=1102591689817&aid=AiJ2op_EUck.

 

2026-01-12T11:24:09-08:00January 12th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, Labor & Employment Law, speaking engagements|Comments Off on Debate at Beverly Hills Bar Association

Top Employment Cases of 2025

California Law & Employment Law Review Publishes Article Co-Authored By Andrew H. Friedman

Andrew H. Friedman, Ramit Mizrahi, Tony Oncidi contribute articles to California Labor & Employment Law Review, Top Employment Cases of 2025.

January 7, 2026 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to congratulate partner Andrew H. Friedman and his co-authors Anthony Oncidi and Ramit Mizrahi on the publication of their latest law review article – The Top Employment Cases of 2025 by the California Labor & Employment Law Review.

2026-01-09T09:01:13-08:00January 7th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications, hostile work environment, Labor & Employment Law, law review articles, Wage & Hour Violations|Comments Off on Top Employment Cases of 2025

Groundbreaking Employment Law Treatise

Andrew H. Friedman 2026 Litigating Employment Discrimination Cases.

Helmer Friedman LLP is thrilled to announce that the 2026 edition of Andrew H. Friedman’s ground-breaking two-volume employment law treatise – Litigating Employment Discrimination Cases (James Publishing – 2005-2026) was just published by James Publishing.

 

Mr. Friedman is extremely thankful to his Editor, Lisa Dunne, and to his Contributing Authors – Ted Cohen, Anthony Oncidi, and Alan Reinach. The treatise is ready to be ordered at https://jamespublishing.com/product/litigating-employment-discrimination-cases/

2026-01-09T09:16:31-08:00January 6th, 2026|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications|Comments Off on Groundbreaking Employment Law Treatise

Best Lawyers in Los Angeles & Beverly Hills 2026

Best Law Firms Los Angeles & Beverly Hills 2026.

Helmer Friedman LLP Named To Best Lawyers’ 2026 List of Best Law Firms in Los Angeles & Beverly Hills for Employment Law – Individuals

November 1, 2025 – Helmer Friedman LLP is very pleased to announce that it has been selected by Best Lawyers for inclusion in its 2026 list of the Best Law Firms in Los Angeles & Beverly Hills for Employment Law – Individuals – https://www.bestlawfirms.com/firms/helmer-friedman-llp/70893/US.

“It is always an honor to be named to the Best Lawyers/Best Law Firms annual lists,” Gregory D. Helmer said. “Inclusion on these lists means that our clients and peers think highly of us.”

2025-11-12T12:44:19-08:00November 12th, 2025|Greg Helmer|Comments Off on Best Lawyers in Los Angeles & Beverly Hills 2026

$6,000,000 Jury Award in CSU Gender Discrimination Lawsuit

Dr. Anissa Rogers Awarded $6 Million in CSU Gender Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Lawsuit

Andrew H. Friedman, Anissa Rogers after $6 Million jury verdict in gender discrimination, harassment, retaliation lawsuit against CSU. In a precedent setting victory against California State University, Andrew H. Friedman and Courtney Abrams, in partnership with renowned lead trial attorney David M. deRubertis, obtained a $6 Million jury verdict on behalf of a former California State University, San Bernardino Associate Dean Anissa Rogers in a lawsuit entitled Clare Weber & Anissa Rogers v. Board of Trustees of the California State University (the State of California acting in its higher education capacity); Tomás Morales, an individual; and Jake Zhu, an individual (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV05549).
Dr. Rogers alleged in her lawsuit that, despite repeated reports by her and other employees (including both men and women) to multiple CSU officials that Defendant Jake Zhu (Dean of CSU, San Bernardino’s Palm Desert campus) was harassing and discriminating against female employees on account of their gender, CSU took no action whatsoever to remedy the situation. Instead, CSU constructively fired Dr. Rogers from her Associate Dean position.

The jury’s $6 million award is entirely for noneconomic damages, including compensation for emotional distress and the personal toll suffered by Dr. Rogers on account of workplace gender discrimination, harassment and retaliation. Dr. Rogers’ claims highlighted how the nation’s largest public university system, employing more than 56,000 people across 23 campuses, failed to enforce its own anti-harassment policies despite repeated internal warnings and public scandals.

“This case exposed what women inside Cal State have been saying for years: the mistreatment of women within the Cal State system is not just a series of one-off incidents; the problem is systemic and structural,” said Andrew H. Friedman of Helmer Friedman, LLP who represented Dr. Rogers. This verdict should serve as a loud message to CSU to clean up its act and take complaints of employment violations seriously,” Friedman added. “Cal State can no longer ignore the systemic twin problems of gender-based mistreatment and retaliation that is endemic. The jury saw the importance of holding this institution to account, and we’re very appreciative of that.”

Dr. Rogers’ lead trial lawyer, David M. deRubertis of The deRubertis Law Firm APC, argued the gender-based mistreatment of Dr. Rogers was an inevitable result after CSU San Bernardino ignored a 2015 “climate survey” that suggested a culture of fear, intimidation, gender-based mistreatment and bullying at Cal State San Bernardino and recommended adoption of an anti-bullying policy and an audit of HR practices and policies. At trial, CSU San Bernardino President Tomas Morales admitted that neither recommendation was implemented.

Courtney Abrams of Courtney Abrams, PC, who also represented Dr. Rogers, announced Monday following a multiweek trial overseen by LA County Superior Court Judge Maurice Leiter, that the jury verdict “represents a resounding rejection of CSU’s long-running denials of gender bias within its ranks. Dr. Rogers stood up not only for herself, but also the other women who have been subjected to gender-based double-standards within the Cal State system.”

Together, Friedman, Abrams, and deRubertis also represent Clare Weber, the former Vice Provost of Academic Affairs of CSU San Bernardino whose claims of gender pay equity, harassment based on gender and retaliation are expected to go to trial next year.

Read more at https://www.helmerfriedman.com/calstate-university-sued-for-gender-discrimination/

2025-10-21T12:02:40-08:00October 21st, 2025|Case Update, Front Page News, gender discrimination, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Jury Award|Comments Off on $6,000,000 Jury Award in CSU Gender Discrimination Lawsuit

PBA 2025 Labor & Employment Year in Review

Pasadena Bar Association Invites Andrew H. Friedman To Present “2025 Employment Law Year In Review”

PBA 2025 Employment Law Year in Review - Labor & Employment Section December 15, 2025.December 15, 2025 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to announce that the Labor & Employment Section of the Pasadena Bar Association has invited Mr. Friedman to speak at an MCLE webinar entitled: “2025 Employment Law Year In Review.”

The Pasadena Bar describes the program: “2025 was another bumper year for employment law appellate decisions. This fast-paced panel will cover the top employment cases of the past year, including cases from the United States and California Supreme Courts, the Ninth Circuit, and California Courts of Appeal.”

Mr. Friedman is speaking along with Anthony J. Oncidi of Proskauer.

The MCLE program will take place on December 15, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. PST. For more information or to register, please visit https://pasadenabar.org/#!event/2025/12/15/labor-employment-section.

2025-10-29T11:10:08-08:00October 20th, 2025|Andrew Friedman, Labor & Employment Law, speaking engagements|Comments Off on PBA 2025 Labor & Employment Year in Review

McDonnell Douglas: The End Is Near? by Andrew H. Friedman

California Labor & Employment Law Review Publishes Cover Article By Andrew H. Friedman

September 1, 2025 – Helmer Friedman LLP is pleased to announce that the California Labor & Employment Law Review has just published Andrew H. Friedman’s article – MCDONNELL DOUGLAS: THE END IS NEAR? – as the cover article for its September 2025 issue. Sadly, the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test, which was originally established to help plaintiff employees prove discrimination, has increasingly become an employer’s best friend enabling them to obtain summary judgment in so many clearly meritorious cases that even the conservative Justices believe that the time has come to end or, at least, curtail its use at summary judgment.This article explores the increasingly ostentatious charge by a duo of uber conservative Justices – Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch – to reverse or dramatically curtail the use of the tripartite burden-shifting test first announced by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), for the most unlikely of reasons. Justices Thomas and Gorsuch contend that the McDonnell Douglas test is too employer-friendly because it not only “requires a plaintiff to prove too much at summary judgment” but also that it “fails to encompass the various ways in which a plaintiff could prove his claim.” In their dissent in Hittle v. City of Stockton, California, 145 S.Ct. 759, 759-764 (2025) (J. Thomas and J. Gorsuch, dissenting) and their concurrence in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, 145 S.Ct. 1540, 1548-1555 (2025)(J. Thomas and J. Gorsuch, concurring), Justices Thomas and Gorsuch also criticize the use of McDonnell Douglas on motions for summary judgment for a whole host of additional reasons:

  • McDonnell Douglas is not grounded in the text of Title VII or any other source of law – rather, it is a judicially manufactured doctrine and, as such, generates complexity and confusion which cause erroneous results.
  • McDonnell Douglas is incompatible with the summary-judgment standard set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
  • McDonnell Douglas requires courts to draw and maintain artificial distinctions between direct and circumstantial evidence.

Commenting on the publication of his article, Mr. Friedman said: “Sadly, the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test, which was originally established to help plaintiff employees prove discrimination, has increasingly become an employer’s best friend enabling them to obtain summary judgment in so many clearly meritorious cases that even the conservative Justices believe that the time has come to end or, at least, curtail its use at summary judgment.”

If you enjoy Mr. Friedman’s article and you are not currently a member of the Labor and Employment Law Section of the California Lawyer’s Association, you should consider joining at https://calawyers.org/join-the-labor-and-employment-law-section/. As a member of the Labor and Employment Law Section, you will receive every issue of the California Labor and Employment Law Review – a leading resource for staying up-to-date on all the latest developments in Labor and Employment Law. You will also receive member only discounts not only to the Section’s live and ondemand webinars but also for the Section’s flagship programs including:

  • New Employment Practitioner Conference
  • Annual Public Sector Conference
  • Annual Labor and Employment Law Conference
  • Annual Advanced Wage and Hour Conference
  • Annual Advanced Mediation Conference
2025-09-02T09:37:30-08:00September 1st, 2025|Andrew Friedman, employment law publications|Comments Off on McDonnell Douglas: The End Is Near? by Andrew H. Friedman

Andrew H. Friedman And Tony Oncidi To Present (in)Famous Annual Review

Andrew H. Friedman And Tony Oncidi To Present Their (in)Famous Annual Review At The 41st Labor And Employment Law Annual Conference Of The CLA Labor And Employment Law Section

Andrew Friedman and Tony Oncidi 41st Annual CLA update July 2025.

July 25, 2025 – Helmer Friedman LLP is very excited to announce that, once again, Andrew H. Friedman and his long-term speaking partner, Tony Oncidi of Proskauer Rose, will be presenting their Employment Law Year In Review on Friday, July 25, 2025 at the 41st Labor And Employment Law Annual Conference of the CLA Labor and Employment Law Section. The Labor and Employment Law Section describes their presentation as: “In this fast-paced presentation, Anthony J. Oncidi and Andrew H. Friedman will once again cover the top employment law cases from the past year, with an emphasis on the cases of greatest utility to employment law practitioners.”

For more information or to register, go to

2025-07-30T08:39:04-08:00June 25th, 2025|Andrew Friedman|Comments Off on Andrew H. Friedman And Tony Oncidi To Present (in)Famous Annual Review
Go to Top